tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3634039847604575056.post3134723891107541733..comments2023-11-28T02:49:39.192-08:00Comments on Cruz Lines: "Should I Stay or Should I Go?"Prof. David B. Cruzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17810619657964701172noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3634039847604575056.post-5952496940198612762010-06-24T12:39:15.252-07:002010-06-24T12:39:15.252-07:00Thanks for reading and commenting. As it turns out...Thanks for reading and commenting. As it turns out, the change in California law your mother recalls was a 1927 amendment to the Civil Code, i.e. a statutory provision, not a constitutional amendment.Prof. David B. Cruzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17810619657964701172noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3634039847604575056.post-37918725394722208552010-06-24T12:38:55.558-07:002010-06-24T12:38:55.558-07:00Saw you quoted as saying: "We have never seen...Saw you quoted as saying: "We have never seen a constitutional amendment like this in California that would take away rights that people had already exercised."<br />I was reminded a story told to me by my mother (Dorothy Mackay [Maggs]), (who was a student at Boalt Hall around 1924, when she was 20 years old). She said that California passed (or debated?) a law raising the age of Peter Maggsnoreply@blogger.com